Friday, February 03, 2006

SOS From the Republic of Canwest

SOS From the Republic of CanWest:
Media Tactics Interfere with Federal Election Outcomes, Canadian Unity, and Canadian Identity




By Keetah Bryant

Allow me to introduce our “leaders”, Leonard, David, and Gale Asper, inheritants of the late Izzy Asper’s media empire. According to the Manitoba Calling Magazine, this trio is “the second generation to lead the CanWest Global Corp., a company perfectly willing to conquer the media world from it’s Winnipeg headquarters”. Their self-stated mission? “If you can watch it, read it, or download it, we want to be the source.” The photo accompanying the article is equally ambitious; three polished faces, beaming with the light rays that stream out
from behind a globe, which is interestingly nestled between the three of them. “Think big”, is the oversized caption.

The CanWest Global Media giant hasn’t succeeded in taking over the world yet, but they have brutally taken over the British Columbian media. This has been accomplished through blatant censorship, restricting contribution of content to select Asper-approved individuals, and restricting represented ideologies in all their media, with what are commonly referred to by the suppressed as “Aspertorials”. These actions, are purposefully and directly related to a precise political and economic agenda, which puts corporate interests above all else. This
is best illustrated by the involvement of CanWest Global’s corporate elite, the players, in their exclusive circles of capital, politics, and control. This corporate agenda will be best served by a Conservative majority in the House of Commons, with Stephen Harper as the Prime Minister.
CanWest Global, and anyone else who has a background in social psychology know, covert and
intentional manipulation of the masses is possible. Through a series of tactical endeavors on the part of the individual,( in this case, a corporation is an individual as well), one can change the behavior and beliefs of others, even on a mass scale.

Evidence for this tactical manipulation can be found in the media proliferation of polls and their respective interpretations, most of which are of a questionable source. It’s evident in the inaccuracy and lack of representativeness in CanWest Global’s media content. Manipulation is obvious in the one-sided opinions that appear in all papers across British Columbia, and flow out of the lips and off the keyboards of CanWest’s journalists across the country. This ultimately functions to restrict the flow of accurate, representative communication between British Columbia and the rest of Canada. Ethical journalists, seasoned writers, scholarly
professionals, ethnic communities, even entire publications are screaming over here, but no one in the rest of Canada can hear us. We are shut out from participating in our local media. No one can hear our complaints over the din being created by CanWest Global’s proclamations across the nation, the strategic and ubiquitous shouts and whispers of pre-election “evidence” , all pointing to a Conservative victory on January 23, 2006.

The Republic of CanWest: Media Takeover in British Columbia
It wasn’t always like this here in British Columbia - seasoned journalists from the area can remember better times. Some would say the changes began when the Fraser Institute (which has the reputation around here as being a right-wing think tank) was born out of the generosity of MacMillan Bloedell, who seemed to be having trouble with BC’s NDP government, back in 1974. Others feel that 2000 was the fatal year, with whisperings of a
CanWest’s purchase blowing around in the summer, and ending in fall of that year with the highly-publicized and equally controversial CanWest Global purchase of Conrad Black’s $3.2 billion dollar newspaper chain, Hollinger’s.

Israel Asper, founder of the media giant, handed the reins of the company over to his son Leonard at this time, and Leonard’s been leading the way ever since. Just a year after Leonard became CEO and president, CanWest Global achieved national recognition as the top TV network for prime time. When questioned about the Hollinger purchase in a television interview, Israel Asper explained, “When we bought... we intended to make our point of view heard. That’s one of the joys of being a publisher-in-chief...” Even back in 1991, when Izzy acquired 20% of TV3 in New Zealand, he made his position clear. A paragraph from James Winter’s article, “Canada’s Media Monopoly” explains:

Izzy Asper gathered 200 employees of the station in the cafeteria and astounded them by asking a journalist, “You. What business do you think you’re in?”The journalist replied that “the business we’re in is to make sure our audience gets the most carefully researched news and information possible.” Asper asked the same question of the drama andentertainment departments, and got similar answers.
“You’re all wrong,” he told them. “You’re in the business of selling soap.

CanWest Global’s holdings in British Columbia are vast, and account for over 90% of the daily
newspaper circulation in this province. The holdings encompass a large number of small weekly and bi-weekly papers that circulate in the Lower Mainland and on the Island, and are delivered to homes all over the province, free of charge. The following is a list of publications, owned and controlled by CanWest Global here in British Columbia: National Post, The Vancouver Sun, Vancouver Province, Victoria Times-Colonist, Alberni Valley Times,
Nanaimo Daily News, Westerly News (Port Alberni), Pennyworth Shopper (Port Alberni), Burnaby Now, New Westminster Record, Surrey Now, Langley Advance, Abbotsford Times, Chilliwack Times, Maple Ridge Times, Coquitlam Now, Richmond News, Delta Optimist , Vancouver Courier Eastside, Vancouver Courier Downtown, Vancouver Courier Westside, North Shore News, Campbell River Courier Island, Comox Valley Echo, Cowichan Valley Citizen.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with BC, and cannot conceptualize the expanse of this corporate media empire, get out a map and see for yourself - the reality is staggering.
It didn’t take long for non-partisan, ethical journalists to feel the heaviness of the Asper hand that inevitably came along with the Hollinger purchase - it was either bend or bail. The grumblings in the journalistic community could be heard shortly after ownership transferred hands, and only heightened with CanWest Global’s takeover and “clean-up” at the National Post shortly thereafter. Chronicles of dissent and suppression from outside the stronghold
CanWest Global of course, has holdings outside of British Columbia. However, because those
publications are located in areas where journalists have access to other newspapers that aren’t owned by CanWest, their voices are audible. The following chronology gives a brief overview of the concerns that were expressed by the audible voices in ethical journalism, outside the province of BC.

  • July, 2001 - Lawrence Martin, a relentless critic of Jean Cretien (a long-time friend of Israel Asper), was fired from his national affairs column.
  • August 2001 - The board of editorial contributors is disbanded at the Montreal Gazette. On this board sits the chairman of the Muslim Council of Montreal, Salam Elmenyawi. He is told he is welcome to submit several articles a year, but hears no response on his submissions. When interviewed by the Globe in December, he was quoted as saying, “I don’t think I’ll be writing anything for the Gazette anymore. I suspect the Muslim approach and point of view is no longer welcome.”
  • September 2001 - Michael Goldbloom jumps ship at the Montreal Gazette, after seven years tenure, saying in no uncertain terms the move is due to the change in ownership, and the direction that CanWest Global is taking.
  • November 2001 - Peggy Curran writes a critical column on a CBC documentary about the treatment of journalists in Israeli territories. The column is first held, and then followed by a re-write order.
  • December 2001 - CanWest’s decree for “national editorials” is denounced by Montreal Gazette journalists, and is met with a formal letter of disapproval, bearing 77 signatures. CanWest media does not cover the story. Instead, CanWest Global issues a gag order and a warning to Montreal Gazette employees. It then extends the gag order to all print and broadcast newsrooms in Canada.
  • January 2002 - Stephen Kimber, a 20-year veteran with the Halifax Daily News, quits after CanWest Global kills his column that criticizes the company policies. Colleague Stephanie Domet, also has her column that supported Kimber spiked. She too, quits. Kimber is quoted as saying the Aspers view their newspapers as “promotional vehicles for their television network” and as “private, personal pulpits from which to express their views”. Kimber’s article was subsequently published in the Globe and Mail, where he wrote, “The Aspers support the federal Liberal party. They’re pro-Israel. They think rich people like themselves deserve tax breaks. They support privatizing health care delivery. And they believe their newspapers...should agree with them.” In this same month, David Asper is quoted in the Toronto Sun, describing journalists as “bleeding hearts” committed to the “ongoing pathetic politics of the Canadian left.”Donald Cuthland, an Aboriginal journalist, has his column in the Saskatoon Star Phoenix spiked due to it’s “historical inaccuracy”. Although he’s been an active columnist of the Phoenix for 10 years, the unofficial verdict on his work is that it was to “anti-Israel”.Vince Carlin, chair of the school of journalism at Ryerson University in Toronto is quoted by the Washington Post. “You can fit everyone who controls significant Canadian media in my office. This is not a healthy situation.”
  • March 2002 - The Regina-Leader Post suspends/reprimands 10 journalists for their by-line withdrawal protest of censorship. The International Federation of Journalists accuses CanWest of victimizing young journalists who defendprofessional standards. In a press release, the IFJ states: “If this had happened in Eastern Europe 15 years ago there would have been widespread protests from media owners and journalists’ groups. The issues today are no different - the fight for editorial freedom and protection from censorship.”
  • April 2002 - Bill Turpin, editor for 16 years at the Halifax Daily News, resigns. This decision was most influenced by the experiences of his former colleague, Stephen Kimber. Bill Turpin admits to spiking Kimber’s article at editor-in-chief Murdoch Davis’ request. He publicly admits his regret over the decision, and resigns.
  • May 2002 - William Marsden participates in a public debate about media concentration in Canada. He is issued an official warning, which cites Montreal Gazette and CanWest Global gag orders.
  • June 2002 - Russell Mills is fired from the Ottawa Citizen - he has been publisher there since 1986. David Asper fires him after he runs a series of articles on Jean Cretien, calling for him to resign. Mills files a wrongful dismissal suit, and settles out of court with the Aspers for an undisclosed amount. Russell Mill’s replacement at the Citizen has the job title “General Manager”.British Columbia: The voice of the outcasts
There have been a few local rumblings here in BC, mostly coming from small online publications like the Tyee (www.thetyee.ca) , which feature regular writers like Donald Gutstein. Gutstein is a senior lecturer in the School of Communication at Simon Fraser University, and as such he understands the necessity for accuracy in effective communication. In January of 2005, Gutstein worked tirelessly on making sure the ethical journalists’ opinion was heard at a senate inquiry into the alleged media domination in BC. He gave instructions in an online publication, on how other journalists could participate. The Tyee editor David Beers participated, but the senate inquiry came to BC and left without much fanfare or media coverage, which is exactly what CanWest Global had intended.
Mazen Chouaib of the Globe and Mail has a piece on CanWest’s vilification of Muslims on adbusters’ CanWest watch website. The webpage www.adbusters.org/metas/corpo/canwestwatch is loaded with strong language, relevant thoughts, and plans for revenge and exposure. The intent is expressed, to buy a full-page ad in
the Globe and Mail, detailing the media monopoly that has occurred here in British Columbia, where adbusters is based. Problem is, the ad will cost $60,000 and collections to date will only cover a fraction of the cost. Due to it’s relatively recent appearance on the magazine scene, and some would even say extremist content, circulation of the bi-monthly publication isn’t that large, an indication that hopes of penetrating the CanWest bubble aren’t going to materialize any time soon. In the meantime, adbusters website suggests “jamming” CanWest’s
newspaper boxes. If you have any better ideas on how to stick it to CanWest, you can e-mail tess@adbusters.org.

The corporate directors of CanWest have remained relatively unchanged since 2000, although the media landscape and it’s inherent purpose, flexes and bends beneath their influence. Israel Asper died in October of 2003, leaving the Asper legacy to his three children, and the corporate board he helped assemble. The annual shareholders meeting for CanWest Global was held on January 12 of this year, where the nominees for the board were essentially the same as they were before, with just a few minor changes. The yearly agenda also called for the reappointment of PriceWaterhouse, a long-standing partner, to continue performing the corporation’s audits.

The Players: CanWest Global’s Current Heads of State
Who makes up the rules, establishes policy, and goals for CanWest Global Communications Corp.? Although the Asper trio hold the lion’s share of CanWest Global’s worth, there are other integral members of the corporation, like the corporate officers and board members, who also have a stake in the future growth of the corporation. The mandates, the goals, the purpose of a corporation are all determined by the members of the board and the corporate officers, whether this corporation is a media provider or otherwise. To ensure the agenda of the corporation is met, the board members have direct and influential contact with their “ground troops”, the people that actually run the business, create and distribute the product. In this case, the “ground troops” happen to be newspaper editors, journalists, and pollsters. Let’s take a quick look at who all these essential and influential people are:


Leonard J. Asper, President and CEO
Leonard received his Undergraduate degree from the University of Boston, and later his law degree from the University of Toronto. He believes that big cities are not ideal places to live and thrive, and as such makes his home in River Heights, an exclusive neighborhood in Winnipeg. His wife Sue, and daughters Sarah and Olivia, enjoy boating from the family estate to The Forks when they can. When he’s not busy boating or attending to his empire, Leonard supports a variety of community organizations through his own personal foundation, which
apparently assists immigrants, aboriginal people, children, and abused women to name a few.
David A. Asper, Executive Vice President & Chairman, The National Post Company
David earned his law degree in San Diego, and has spent time in New York, Australia, Ireland and England, even living in London for two years. He also resides in the exclusive River Heights community of Winnipeg, with his wife Ruth and their three children. They are apparently active members of the River Heights Community Center.


Gail S. Asper, Corporate Secretary


Gale’s activities are primarily of a charitable nature, as she chairs the United Way campaign in Winnipeg
and co-chairs the Manitoba Theatre Center’s fundraising campaign. She has 2 sons with her husband, Dr. Michael
Patterson, who is a research scientist.


Dr. Lloyd I. Barber, Board Member
Dr. Barber taught commerce at the University of Saskatchewan between 1955 and 1976. In 1964-65, he
was a member of the Saskatchewan Royal Commission on Government Administration. As Indian Land Claims
Commissioner from 1969 to 1977, Lloyd Barber is known in his circles for his commitment to Aboriginals. He
received the nation’s highest civilian honor in 1993, the Companion of the Order of Canada. Along with his board
membership at CanWest Global, Dr. Barber is the current President Emeritus at the University of Regina, he is the
Director of Teck Cominco Ltd., Greystone Capital Management, and sits on the board of trustees at Fording Canadian Coal Trust.


Derek H. Burney, Board Member

At 66, Derek Burney is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of New Brunswick Power Corp. He is also visiting Professor and Senior Distinguished Fellow at Carleton University. He is currently the Lead Director at Shell Canada Ltd. and TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd. He is Chairman of the Confederation College Foundation and a Fellow at the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute. Previous to all his current obligations, Mr. Burney has been CEO of CAE Inc. (1999-2000), Chairman and CEO of Bell Canada International, Inc. (1993-1999), and Canadian Ambassador to the United States (1989-1983). From March 1987 to January 1989, Mr.Burney was
Prime Minister Brian Mulroney’s CEO, and was directly involved in the negotiation of the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement. He was Mr. Mulroney’s personal representative in the preparations for Houston (1990), London (1991) and Munich (1992) G-7 Economic Summits. His book, a memoire on his government service called “Getting is Done” was published in 2005 by McGill-Queen’s. Ronald J. Daniels, Board Member. A recent appointment to the board, and a recently named 28th Provost at the University of Pennsylvania, Ronald is probably best known for his various publications and active involvement in public policy formation. A Penn News
article from April of 2005 gives us the inside scoop: “At 45, he is an internationally accomplished scholar, who specializes in corporate and securities law, regulation and government reform, and the legal and institutional challenges of economic development.” Ronald is the editor/author of titles like, “Rethinking the Welfare State: The Prospects for Government By Voucher”, and “Corporate Decision-Making in Canada”, among others.
He really put himself on the map “in the wake of 9/11 [when] he spearheaded a major international conference at the University of Toronto focusing on the federal government’s proposed anti-terrorism legislation.” He later published a book on the conference proceedings, published by the University of Toronto, entitled “The Security of Freedom”. It was given to every Member of Parliament.

Frank King, Board Member
As President and CEO of Metropolitan Investment Corporation, and Director of the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, Frank King is a busy man, and a relatively recent addition to this Players Club. On the Agrium management team since 1996, Frank manages to find time to direct Acclaim Energy Inc., Networc Health Inc., The Westaim Corporation, and Wi-Lan Inc. He is also a Trustee of Rio-Can Real Estate Investment Trust. Agrium happens to be a leading global producer of nitrogen fertilizers, and is a major retail supplier of agricultural
products (seeds, chemicals, fertilizers) and services in both North America and Argentina. Although Agrium’s headquarters are in Calgary, Alberta, it owns and operates 18 retail farm centers in Argentina.

Lisa Pankratz (CA/CFA), Board Member
Director and President of Cundill Investment Research Ltd., Lisa is also the CCO for all the operating companies comprising the Cundill Group. Since July 2001, Lisa has been the Director for the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. She has worked as an investment banker with Banker’s Trust and Swiss Bank Corporation, and was a Senior Manager at Ernst and Young in Toronto between 1985-1993.

Backgrounders and Ground Troops: The Enforcement Team in BC
As previously mentioned, a successful corporation has intimate command of their ground troops, and may even have allies in the background, assisting with the corporate agenda. Here’s a few profiles on some of CanWest Global’s ground troops:

Frank McKenna, Canadian Ambassador to the United States
Former Chairman of the Board at CanWest Global, Frank had to abandon his corporate friends for an appointment made by Paul Martin in January of 2005, to the position of Canadian Ambassador to the United States. In a farewell speech to the shareholders in Toronto, on January 27, McKenna reassured “the Board and the controlling family” that he would “still be serving the shareholders of th[e] company, but in a totally different way”. Previous to this prestigious appointment, Frank had been on the following boards: United Parcel Services
of Canada Ltd., BMO Financial Group, General Motors of Canada, Marsh Canada Ltd., Noranda, and Zenon Environmental Inc. According to an article published in the Georgia Strait (January 2005) by charlie smith. These companies, including CanWest Global, donated a combined total of $1,203,555.83 to both Paul Martin’s leadership campaign and to the federal liberals as a whole since 1998. McKenna also sat on the Carlyle Canada advisory board with former US Defense Secretary Frank Carlucci and former US Secretary of State, James A. Baker III., previous to his January 2005 appointment. The Carlyle group, based in Washington DC is notorious for it’s dealings in armaments, ammunitions, and products of war.

Daniel Savas, Sr. Vice President of Ipsos-Reid Corporation, Vancouver
Savas has been busy in Vancouver for a long time, working extensively at the Fraser Institute, and with the Angus-Reid Group. Kyle Braid is the mouthpiece of Ipsos-Reid Vancouver, and can be found interpreting polls in the Vancouver Sun more often than some would consider necessary. Both Braid and Savas are frequent faces in the Vancouver/British Columbia big business circle. In March of 2003, Daniel even gave a lecture on corporate responsibility at the Vancouver Board of Trade’s Leadership Summit Series. His lecture, called “Doing Good
Means Doing Well”, detailed the various economic advantages to building trust with one’s customers - the last reason he cited was “the feel good factor” which was related to corporate honesty.. The majority of his speech was devoted to convincing attendees that image maintenance is an important factor in overall economic success. (The entire speech can be viewed at www.boardoftrade.com/vbot_speech.)

Dennis Skulsky, President and Publisher, The Vancouver Sun
Dennis joined the Pacific Newsgroup in 1996, while it was still under the Hollinger umbrella, and occupied various corporate management positions for Southam Inc., a holding of Conrad Black. He is currently the Director for the Business Council of British Columbia and the Vancouver Board of Trade. He sits on various boards, including the Vancouver Fireworks Society, The International Newspaper Marketing Association, and The Canadian Newspaper Association. Rumors have been flying around that he might be leaving his post at Vancouver
Sun to head up Orca Bay Sports, which is owned by Francesco Aquilini and Seattle billionaire John McCaw. Skulsky has ruffled a few feathers at the Tyee, and Donald Gutstein can’t help but point out some of Skulsky’s more questionable alliances, primarily his publication’s alliance with Telus. Partners in the Fireworks Festival Society, and partners in other ways too it seems, Gutstein points out that Telus spends large advertising dollars with Skulsky. Interstingly, Skulsky’s publication conveniently neglected to mention much of anything on
the Telus Worker’s Union and their request for a fair collective bargaining agreement. Statistic on Vancouver Sun circulation, and access to the Vancouver Sun online can be found at www.canada.com, also owned by CanWestGlobal Corp.

Kirk LaPointe, Managing Editor, The Vancouver Sun
Kirk is the former Senior Vice-President of CTV, Vancouver’s only local alternative to CanWest Global’s local stations. Previous to this, he was Associate Publisher and Editor-in-Chief of the Hamilton Spectator. He also worked as Executive Editor of the National Post after CanWest took it over entirely, helping to launch the daily national paper. Previous to his dedicated work with CanWest Global, LaPointe worked as a journalist and host for
a number of CBC Newsworld programs (1989-1995). While working at the CBC in 1991, Kirk was also Ottawa Bureau Chief and News Editor with The Canadian Press. After his stint with CP and CBC, he moved on to Editor-in-Chief and General Manager of Southam News, under Conrad Black. Today, Kirk can be found lecturing on his successes and his methods at the University of British Columbia’s school of journalism. Interestingly, Kirk’s employer gave the UBC school of journalism a fat installment of cash, following the supportive testimony of Donna Logan, the head of the school, provided to the Senate inquiry. He sits on the Board of the Center for Faith and the Media, and is a member as well.

Marlyn Graziano, Group Editor for CanWest Mediaworks Publications, Inc.
Marlyn used to be an editor at the Surrey Now in British Columbia, one of the small, local bi-weekly papers. Now she ensures the content of all the little bi-weeklies that CanWest owns here in British Columbia fall in line with the notion of one company, one editorial position.
When in doubt, when the Asper ideology needs some sort of promotion (or when she herself needs some sort of promotion), she appears in the local papers as a “guest editorial” writer. Most recently she appeared in the Surrey Now, in a guest editorial that served to disparage Gilles Duceppe, his ideas, and his presence at the national leadership debate.

From the Mouths of Horses: The Agenda of the CanWest Global Communications Corp. (in their own words)

“Big media are very good , there’s no connection between cross-media ownership and declining journalism, and convergence so far has been profoundly positive” - Kirk LaPointe.

(Originally quoted byGutstein in the Tyee. Response made during questioning by Senator Fraser and her colleagues during a 2005 inquiry into the concentration of declining diversity in Vancouver’s news media).

“The Company is unique among Canadian media companies in looking for growth beyond Canada’s borders and thereby developing an asset base and business structure that leaves the company less exposed to the ups and downs of Canadian economic cycles.”
-The Honorable Frank McKenna P.C., Q.C (closing remarks at the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, CanWest Global Communications Corp. Toronto, Ontario. January 27,2003)

Select quotes from Leonard Asper’s speech, “Inventing the Future”, to The Canadian Club, Ottawa,
December 17, 2002

“Our detractors come from our competitors, the CBC, the Globe & Mail, and the Toronto Star and their minions and proxies, aided by disgruntled current and former employees and by the exhortations of anti-business academics. They just can’t come to terms with the notion that the media is a business and that owners of those businesses must treat them as such in order to attract capital...”

“And a few, disgruntled and opportunistic journalists who have been the subject of editing for many years long before CanWest came along, will no doubt continue to abuse the word ‘censorship” and thereby gain their 15 minutes of fame. It has been so successful for Stephen Kimber that now last week two journalists at the New York Times are claiming that the editing of their articles is ‘censorship’. I guess we no longer need editors, because they’re all just censors.”

“Professors at some of our journalism schools are repeating their 30 year refrain about the evils of media concentration.”

“Channel brand awareness will be increasingly important...Newspapers will continue to make the switch to a pay for use model for Internet-delivered content. The free ride is ending. Some content will remain free, but enhanced or premium content will be available only for a fee.”

“Peer to peer file sharing for video data is the greatest threat to the industry of all, because it could ‘Napsterize” traditional media... the wireless devices can all perform the simple task of transferring unauthorized material, much like one forwards an e-mail today.”

“Advertisers in general are demanding better targeting, and they also want to know how the recipient of that ad responded. Newspapers do this already too, in a crude way, by delivering different sets of flyers and inserts to different postal codes.”

“We are like the general contractor working with the designer and the architect, not the painter or the carpenter, hoping to get hired after all the material decisions have been made... We do this all in the face of daunting regulatory hurdles. While I am pleased to discuss the state of our industry it cannot be done in isolationof the regulatory infrastructure.”

“We are trying to gain the right to advertise prescription pharmaceuticals. CBS and CNN and NBC beam these commercials to Canadian homes... but Canadian broadcasters and newspapers cannot do so. This prohibits an estimated $300 million of revenue from reaching Canadian media companies.”

“We are in support of consumer choice as long as the opportunities and obligations are the same for all parties.”

“By introducing a national newscast reaching almost 900,000 people nightly, more that either of CBC’s national newscasts... CanWest has made an overwhelming contribution and added a refreshing and clearly popular new voice to the Canadian media landscape.”

“We are busy preparing for the future, and doing it the best way we know how - by inventing it”.
(You can view the entirety of this speech online at the Canadian Club of Ottawa website


Select Quotes from David Asper’s Speech, given at the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, October 14, 2004

“The Hollinger Canadian newspapers acquisition[s] changed our company significantly...They gave us the scale and the clout to maintain out distinct Western identity and purpose in a media market dominated by Eastern-based ownership.”

“The Calgary Herald not only has a much longer history in the community, but it’s reach into the psyche of Calgary operates at a much different level than television... the very nature of newspapers [is] that they evoke much more intense and emotional relationships with our consumers.”

“Under Sifton, the Canadian government at last got serious about populating the west. While that story is very sad and full of painful periods of overt discrimination, it is also one of brilliant marketing. Some of it would never pass current federal and provincial regulatory standards!... Sifton saw western Canada as a commodity...so he embarked on an image campaign... He banned the publication of Manitoba temperatures abroad. He even purged all references to snow and cold in some official publications. And he took his message to
the world.”

“The premiere has decided that the media and the rest of Canada are out to get him, you and yourresource wealth... This is the same premiere [Ralph Klein] who, with all the positive innovation in health care that has occurred in Alberta, pulled the rug out from Stephen Harper in the federal campaign by giving credit to phony Liberal claims that Conservatives have a secret agenda on healthcare... Ask yourself whether Ralph Klein helped or hurt Stephen Harper in the federal election, and I think you know the answer.”

“Mr.Klein himself acknowledges that it’s not an issue, and nothing like it is even remotely on anyone’s agenda this side of Jack Layton.” (On the effects of the NEP)

“The federal liberals did a pretty good job in the last election of scaring voters to stay away from the Conservative Party. The Liberals version of ‘they are out to get us’ was that electing Conservatives would expel Canadians from their culture of entitlement into a cold dark world... To this end, the National Post fights its way every day to win over readers and bring them closer to [our] views... I am convinced that the National Post hasplayed an important role in re-defining the national debate, and I am very proud to be a part of it.”

“We openly debate the private delivery of health care while others condemn even the discussion of it. We discuss junk science and environmental issues while others cling relentlessly to trendy tree-hugging thinking. In case the premiere forgets, The Herald, Global Sunday, and the Post led the debate in this country on the question of whether Kyoto makes any sense while others turned it into the trend du jour... We debate the need for democratic reform including the need for a triple E senate."

“The same is true in the Herald. We have endorsed the Premiere all the way. Yet, he even attacks the local media in another delusional belief that his programs and policies do not get coverage... I won’t bore you reciting all the facts, but I can assure you that our media in Alberta have given the Premier expansive coverage. I mean the facts simply speak for themselves.”

Of deep relevance is the fact that Clifford Sifton was directly related with the construction of the Canadian coast-to-coast railway, and the rather ethnocentric but strategic treatment of immigrants at that time. The racist ideologies that prevailed then were effective for business profits, but restrictive and inhumane for those who were discriminated against. Most Canadians today would find such regulations and practices highly un-Canadian.

Fraser Institute, Reports and Press Releases.

“Climate change activists are exaggerating the certainty in the linkage between human action and climate change and advocating policies that offer no environmental gain, but a lot of economic pain. These prescriptions are likely to deprive society of the economic productivity it needs to protect environmental quality”

(Press release, July 21, 2003)

“A worst-case scenario report, long buried in the bowels of the Pentagon, has been dusted off by global warming enthusiasts in a last ditch effort to persuade the United States to repent and sign the costly Kyoto Treaty... The Schwartz-Randall climate report, indeed, is a purely speculative exercise in readiness planning for extreme climate changes of the sort seen in reconstructions of ancient temperatures. Many scientists saw the hyping of the Pentagon report as an eleventh-hour gesture by die-hard environmentalists to salvage the sinking
Kyoto Treaty on climate change, which has already been rejected by the United States and Australia, and is about to suffer the same fate in Russia.”

(Climate Alarmist Misrepresent Pentagon Report, March 10, 2004).


It is interesting to note, the Fraser Institute has received $120,000 from Exxon Mobil since 1998, and has been the subject of much public criticism and scrutiny for it’s privately- funded “studies”. It has also consistently called for tax relief for corporations, so that Canadian taxes could be more in line with those found in the United States, Canada’s largest trading partner. Most recently, it called for the decriminalization of marijuana, the argument being that the illegal industry only served to fund organized crime.

Derek H. Burney on Canada-US Relations:
The following quotations were taken from two speeches given by Mr. Burney. The first, given on September 20, 2005 at the Canadian Institute of International Affairs Toronto Branch Reception, is entitled “Canada-US Relations: Weeds in the Garden”. On November 17, 2005 he gave a very similar speech, entitled “Canada - US Relations: Are we getting it right?” to the Ranchmen’s Club in Calgary, drawing on excerpts from his newly published book. Both of these speeches can be viewed in their entirety at:

www.carleton.ca/ctpl/publications/speeches.html.


“We should take our head out of the sand and reconsider our position on missile defense and endeavor, more generally, to become more than a spectator in the defense of our own continent...We cannot afford a free ride on our own defense. Where’s the sovereignty in that?”

“We need to stop ‘huffing and puffing’ over softwood lumber... Tough talk is no substitute for action... and the pretense of diversions to China are, as I said, just that... The Americans were ‘puzzled’ (diplomat speak for ‘mad as hell’) at our decision on missile defense. We in turn were ‘puzzled’ by their repudiation of a NAFTA ruling on softwood lumber.”

“The highlight for me personally and, I suspect the cornerstone of Mr.Mulroney’s legacy was the negotiation of the Free Trade Agreement in 1987... Mulroney worked very hard on his Washington network and on Canada-US relations... his persistence and conviction brought real dividends at the time, albeit without much domestic popularity.”

“Washington is a city of ‘retail politics’, where networking is the name of the game with the
Administration, with Congress, the media, the lobbyists and all others involved in the ‘’Power Game".

“Canadians celebrate our ‘differences’ almost as a litmus test or measure of our ‘distinctiveness’ from Americans, where as Americans tend, when they think about us at all, to see our similarities. Americans are proud of what they are: Americans. Canadians are proud of what they are not: Americans. Americans believe anything worth doing must be worth overdoing. Canadians believe anything worth doing must be worth a government
grant.”

“In networking - what life in Washington is really all about - my wife and I each had regular and extremely close personal contacts at the highest levels and with all branches of government.”

“...security and prosperity should be the over-riding priorities for our government and relations with the United States are critical to both... Some Canadians believe that creating differences with the United States underlies our ‘independence’. In fact, it does the opposite. ‘Independence’ is, in fact, a peculiar objective in an increasingly interdependent world. After all, North Korea is ‘independent’.”

“It is never easy, even in good times, to deal with the United States. After all, Americans are #1 and they know it...Drift, complacency, and a penchant for differences do not equate with good diplomacy, but regrettably, good diplomacy is not always good politics.”

“In order to manage our affairs effectively we do not need to endorse any individual leader or all the views of any Administration. After all, there are sharp differences of view inside America itself... while personalities come and go, interests are long-standing.”

“We should not rely exclusively on the goodwill of individual leaders anymore than we should allow our attitudes and our interests to be distracted by negative views about individual leaders at any given time... We could use more creative thinking and more consistent political leadership - a real sense of purpose from the top and actions reflecting conviction, not wariness.”

“I recognize that the current political climate is not propitious for any kind of serious engagement -especially with a minority government heading into election... If that is indeed what we want, we need torecognize above all that effective management requires leadership, conviction, and coherence.”

“Institutions properly structured with better rules and disciplines, can not only help deflect political heat from issues of the moment - such as a security glitch at the border - but also temper the huge power imbalance that otherwise bedevils this relationship. Sometimes the best defense is a good offense.”

“...stakeholders, particularly those of you in the business community should shake off your customary timidity and speak out. Business support - and that of key Premieres like Peter Lougheed - was vital to success in earlier trade negotiations, and could help restore a much-needed jolt of common sense in the management of our most vital relationship today. If you do not, you may be sure that others with a very different agenda will happily fill the vacuum.”

These quotes, as well as the previous ones, clearly indicate the sort of agenda that CanWest Global Communications Corp. board members have on their mind. Comments that were made by Leonard and David Asper to key shareholders demonstrate their ability and willingness to manipulate the content of their papers in order to advance a given agenda or a particular individual, provided it benefits the shareholders. Leonard Asper has explicitly stated that the corporation is about business, first and foremost. Freedom of the press and freedom of
expression do not apply to his business, as far as he is concerned. It’s obvious by these comments that shareholders at CanWest Global Communications Corp., and Stephen Harper and the Conservatives share the same agenda.

The ultimate goal of “anyone this side of Jack Layton” is the economic success of the corporation and it’s partners and affiliates. Not only is government involvement in CanWest Global Communications Corp. merely obvious, it is an integral part of the company’s agenda. So how do they do it? What makes them so sure that the polls are correct, that Stephen Harper is on the brink of bringing a Conservative majority into the House of Commons? A little crash course in social psychology answers all those questions.

Social Psychology 101: A Crash Course in Behavior and Belief Manipulation
Social psychologists are concerned with the social side of life, that is, how people interact with and think about others. (Remember, in North American society, the corporation is treated as an individual, and it’s image is managed as such). Scientists in this field work to understand “the nature and causes of individual behavior and thought in social situations.”. This definition was provided by a university-level textbook on social psychology, written by Robert A. Baron and Donn Byrne (2000).

There are a few major asserions that are generally accepted and recognized by all psychologists. One of these well known concepts is called the availability heuristic. A heuristic, in this case, is a mental shortcut that enables us to make decisions in a short amount of time, regarding things of a rather complex nature. The availability heuristic is “a mental shortcut that suggests that the easier it is to bring something to mind, the more frequent or important it is. Proliferation of like stories, polls, and pictures in the media which, all focus on a
particular phenomenon or individual, are likely to induce the availability heuristic.

Numerous studies have all come to the same conclusion: when making judgments about others (politicians and news providers, for example), we will tend to focus more on emotions and feelings, and as such will rely on the-ease-with-which-it-comes-to-mind-rule.
Certain circumstances can increase the likelihood of an individual making a particular choice. Priming is the result of increased / repeated exposure to specific stimuli or events, (graphic images, polls, photographs, etc.). Priming can be defined as “the increased availability of information in memory or consciousness resulting from exposure to specific stimuli or events. What this means is that the more we are exposed to the same information, the more likely we are to believe and use that information when making choices directly related to it. Priming
may occur even when individuals are unaware of the priming stimuli - an effect known as automatic priming.

Just because a person doesn’t buy the paper out of the machine every day, by no means indicates that they are unaffected by it. Interestingly, because of the surprise nature of inconsistent information, we pay much more attention to it. Because it’s unexpected, inconsistent information makes us work harder to understand it. Because of our increased
levels of attention on the inconsistent information, it has a better chance of entering our memory and subsequently influencing our later judgments. Who in British Columbia can forget the day when Stephen Harper appeared on the cover of the National with “Ricky” of the Trailer Park Boys, under a proclamation of familial ties!

Discrimination can also affect people’s perceptions and beliefs. It has been argued in the past that the language and terminology used to describe and communicate stories on ethnic groups within Canada are discriminatory, and that current word usages need to change. Old-fashioned, overt discrimination has beenreplaced with modern racism, which can be characterized by three distinct features. Modern racism is marked by a denial that there is continuing discrimination against minorities, an attribution of antagonism to the demands of
minorities, and resentment about special favours for minority groups. Numerous comments have been made, by various members of the CanWest Global Board, that fit neatly into this definition. The prejudices can beattenuated by gestures of tokenism, “the performance of trivial or small-scale positive actions for people who are targets of prejudice. Prejudiced groups often use tokenistic behaviors as an excuse for refusing more meaningful
beneficial actions. The charitable activities of the Asper family and other Board members might be considered by some to be examples of tokenism.

What is social influence? It’s “the efforts of one or more individuals to change the attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, or behaviors of one or more others”. Individuals that change their attitudes or behavior in order to adhere to existing ideas are conforming. Conformity breeds cohesiveness, defined as “the degree of attraction felt by an individual toward an influencing group”. When cohesiveness is high, the pressures towards conformity are high. What this means is, as poll numbers in the papers reflect the dominance of the Conservatives, people feel
more pressure to conform to the majority, even if it is just a number on the page.

Why do people feel so inclined toconform? Because of social norms - nobody wants to be abnormal. Polls in the paper are essentially injuctive norms, defined as “norms specifying what ought to be done - what is approved or disapproved behavior in a given social situation. Various studies have proven that social norms, injunctive social norms in particular, exert strong effects on expressed behavior. In the case of political polls, they can exert a strong influence on people’s voting behavior.

Who are the compliance professionals according to social psychologists? People who’s success lies in their ability to get others to say yes. Robert Caldini studied these types, (politicians included), and came to the conclusion that compliance rests on six basic principles:

  • friendship/liking,
  • commitment/consistency,
  • scarcity,
  • reciprocity,
  • social validation, and
  • authority.
All of these basic principles, these goals of a successful compliance professional, can be met using strategic tactics of impression management, something which our friends at
CanWest Global (and their associates) have mentioned more than once. Here are a few of the tactics used by masters of impression management when they want to get others to say yes:

  • Ingratiation - a technique for gaining compliance in which requesters first induce target persons to like them (flattery or small favors for the target person), then attempt to change their behavior in some desired way.
  • “that’s-not-all” technique - the requester offers target persons additional benefits before they have decided whether to comply, or reject specific requests.
  • deadline technique - the target persons are told they have only limited time to take advantage of some offer or obtain some item.
  • playing hard to get - a suggestion that a person, object, or outcome is scarce and hard to obtain.
Sometimes, tactics are not enough to gain compliance, so individuals might demand compliance, obedience, that is. (For an excellent experiment on obedience in people, and how far we as human being are ready to go, look up Milgram’s studies on destructive obedience.) Milgram’s studies indicate that many people will readily obey commands, even from a relatively powerless source of authority, and even if certain commands require them to harm an innocent stranger. This would explain the mass obedience among CanWest Global’s
journalistic staff here in British Columbia, as they seem to have no problem carrying out the highly damaging agenda of the Asper family empire. Destructive obedience can stem from a number of factors, and can be exacerbated if there is “a gradual escalation of the scope of the commands given”, and if the situation proceeds in a rapid fashion.

In order to reduce the occurrence of this sort of destructive obedience, Baron and Byrne suggest “reminding individuals that they share in the responsibility of any harm produced, calling into question the motives of authority figures, and informing people of the findings of social psychological research on the topic of social influence.”

Conclusions: The Proof is in the Pudding
Although this review of evidence has been rather lengthy, careful consideration of the facts can yield no conclusion than the following:

There is the definite and undeniably detrimental presence of a media monopoly in British Columbia. Hard evidence of censorship can be found in the testimonials of various reputable journalists, and is further supported in the attached documentation. The views presented by all of CanWest Global Communications staff are guided by the ideologies and beliefs of the owning shareholders, and views that are contrary to this very narrow perspective are either ignored, or usurped and altered to reflect the Asper ideology. CanWestGlobal believes that their “news’ should not be free, and should only be available to those who are able to pay
for it. This monopoly and related censorship can be directly tied to the concise economic and political agenda that prevails at CanWest Global Communications Corp. This agenda, which includes increased involvement with the United States and their military pursuits, sees economic prosperity and national security and top concerns for any national government. This agenda most closely matches with that of Stephen Harper and theConservatives. Both David and Leonard Asper referred directly to this fact in their speeches. It is clear that Liberal loyalties are no longer paramount, and it is clear that in the eyes of CanWest’s shareholders, PaulMartin is not capable of maintaining adequate relations with the United States. The corporation has specifically put itself and it’s political interests on “this side of Jack Layton”, as well, leaving only one alternative.

Manipulation of the masses is possible, as was detailed in the section on social psychology. Various tacticsand image-management strategies are being used by CanWest Global Corp. to steer the direction of the coming election. The most obvious of these tactics is evident in the proliferation of polls from “trusted” sources, like Ipsos-Reid. Brand names and the emotional responses that are tied to them are of paramount concern for corporations. Honesty has never been a part of the agenda, so much as trust.

Compliance and consensus among voters is being obtained through ubiquitous use of polls, photographs, and stories, all which are strategically designed to encourage mass support for Harper. Shareholders admit to giving primary importance to strategical design of content in publications and media coverage. The domination and control of our province by this corporation must stop. British Columbia must have it’s Charter Rights restored. There must be a return to freedom of the press and freedom of expression. We want a return to national participation in national issues, outside of the bubble CanWest Global has encapsulated us in.
We have opinions and sentiments that have gone unreported. There have been huge biases and instances of gross misrepresenation, in stories related to visible minorities, single parents, child poverty, and the widening income disparities between the rich and the poor, just to name a few. It is not acceptable either provincially or nationally, for a private media empire to have so much influenceand sway in the outcome of a federal election. It is unacceptable for a corporation to control the mindset (imposed or otherwise) of an entire province. It is even more appaling that this has been allowed to occur, and it should have been stopped a long time ago.

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Guns, Gangs and Drugs


Guns, Gangs, and Drugs: StatsCan research suggests street crime problem will be agitated by proposed
crime reduction tactics
By Keetah Bryant

There is no argument that gun violence, gangs, and drug-related crimes have been on the rise in Canada’s
major cities. The various interpretations of crime statistics abound in recent media reports, but what everyone
seems to agree on is that violent crime and illegal gunplay are having a less than favourable impact on the lives of
all Canadians. This is precisely why crime and punishment have become major topics of the recent election
campaigns. Quick to lay the blame in the largely publicized death of Jane Creba, citizens are blaming a lax
criminal justice system, while politicians are quick to allay their fears with promises of beefed up police forces and
amendments to sentencing that some have termed Draconian.
It’s only natural in a time of grief and vulnerability to abandon logic, but it’s time to step back from these
emotionally motivated responses to crime and return to a more analytical approach on the issue of gangs, drugs,
and guns in Canada’s major cities.
To understand the problem, we need to understand the relationship between ice cream and violent crime.
Yes, that’s right. Ice cream. It seems that as ice creams sales go up nationally, the incidence of violent crime also
increases. Theses two statistics are positively correlated. From this fact, however, it does not logically follow that
a crack-down on ice cream sales would reduce the overall rate of violent crime across the country. Some other
factor is obviously influencing both phenomenon. In science, this is called the third variable.
The same can be said of gun violence, gangs, and drugs. By all indications, these social ills are on a
disturbing upward trend, that is, they are positively correlated. However, from this fact, it does not logically follow
that the prevalence of drugs and gangs are the causational factors in an increased prevalence of gun-related crime.
Perhaps, like ice cream consumption, there is an unconsidered third variable, or set of variables, that is driving up
the occurrence of all these phenomenon.
Is Punishment an Effective Means of Crime Control?
The existence of this third variable is not up for debate, which will be illustrated in later sections, but the
efficacy of harsh punishment and Draconian police tactics is. Newly suggested preventative and punitive
measures, aimed at restoring public faith in the criminal justice system, are currently being tossed around like vote
bait to a desperate Canadian public, one that has recently been steeped in fear and a feeling of vulnerability. If
enacted, such drastic changes in policy could divert countless valuable tax dollars into crime prevention strategies
that much research has indicated, are prone to failure. In fact, these very methods may even serve to exacerbate
the crime rate by further stressing public programs and resources in our highly populated urban centers.
Does punishment work? Most of us believe that it does, which is why we have come to employ such
methods in dealing with our children in schools, our pets at home, and our employees at work. Stuart Henry, PhD,
of Wayne University sees this belief in punishment as being based in two primary philosophies: (a) criminals
cannot commit crime while they are locked up, and (b) people who commit crimes deserve to be punished. In
reality, our belief in punishment has nothing to do with whether it really works in reducing the actual prevalence
rates of criminal activity. This begs the question: does incarceration of criminals decrease the probability of them
and their cohorts committing crimes in the future?
Studies indicate that some types of mild punishment can be effective in altering behavior patterns in both
human beings and animals. However, in order to be effective, punishment must be administered after each offence
with little time lapse between the offence and the application of the punishment. The effectiveness of this type of
mild punishment increases when pro-social behaviors demonstrated by the offender are positively reinforced.
What does this means in relation to our criminal justice system? In order for punishment to be effective, there
must be a high certainty of getting apprehended, which would require a highly present police force. Lastly, this
swift administration of justice is most effective if moderate levels of punishment are maintained.
Why moderate punishment? Various studies have demonstrated that severe punishment often leads to
avoidance or escape on the part of the offender. This can lead to a proliferation of more sophisticated and less
traceable crimes, as we have seen with identity theft. Harsh punishment can also foster aggressive behavior in
targeted offenders and their generalized social counterparts, who may not even be involved in the criminal justice
system.
Current moderate punishment applications are ineffective
So why isn’t it working? There seems to be a general consensus among Canadians that most current
penalties for crime are rather lenient. The question then becomes: why do these criminals keep re-offending if
moderate punishment is said to be so effective? Too answer this, more questions need to be asked, primarily about
the nature of given crimes, and, the socioeconomic features of the offending population.
These three indices of social degradation - guns, gangs, and drugs - are the central focus of this new,
tough stance on crime, and are inarguably related. According to an interpretive summary crime report, released by
the provincial government, from 1994 to 2004, 72% of all drug crimes in this province were marijuana-related.
Ian Mulgrew, a columnist of the Vancouver Sun, has recently been able to publish an entire book on this illegal yet
burgeoning six billion dollar industry. It’s not really a surprise that this might be the enterprise of choice for
today’s criminals who are a little less than Internet savvy, but are educated enough to assess risks, costs, and
benefits when developing an economic strategy for life in Canada.
Criminal Profiling
So who are these people, and why are they risking jail time and sometimes their lives in gang warfare to
have a stake in this growing underground industry, or any other criminal enterprise? To answer this question and
others that policy-makers in our country might have, the Canadian Center for Justice Statistics published a series of
profile reports in June of 2001. One of these ten reports examines “Visible Minorities in Canada”. Also of interest
are the report titles “Canadians with Low Incomes” and “Immigrants in Canada”. All these reports can be viewed
in full at www.statscan.ca. According to this statistical branch of federal government, as indicated by their chosen
areas of research, income levels, immigration, and visible minority status are all related to crime in Canada. These
reports, based primarily on the most recent census data, indicate that the visible minority presence in Canada has
risen from six percent in 1981, to the current rate of 11%; seven out of ten of these visible minorities are
immigrants. Most of these new citizens choose to make Ontario or British Columbia their home, and in 1996,
94% of all visible minorities lived in one of Canada’s major cities. This sector of the population is younger on
average than the rest of the Canadian populous, and most of them are living with family members - comparatively
few people of a visible minority live alone. They are also more likely to be university educated than the rest of the
Canadian population, of whom about 9% have completed a university program, as opposed to 19% of all visible
minorities. It also seems that a larger percentage of the visible minority population attends school, but somehow,
they are generally less likely than other Canadians to be employed. Only 65% of visible minority males were
employed in 1996, versus 74 % of the rest of Canadian males, aged 16-64. The approximate 10% disparity in
employment rates remains the same for the women.
Working less may mean earning less as well. Even though the educational qualifications of this cohort
are relatively high, their incomes are comparatively low. A visible minority person makes an average of $6000 less
per year than the rest of the Canadian population. In fact, if you are a visible minority, you are nearly twice as
likely as your neighbor to live in poverty, because 36% of the visible minority population in Canada lives below
the poverty level. It is interesting to note that in the United States, whose minority population shares many like
economic circumstances with it’s cohort in Canada, the prison population is a highly disproportionate visible
minority group. Here in Canada, Aboriginals and other visible minorities are highly disproportionate members of
our own prison system.
The changing face of the CMA (census metropolitan area)
A study released by Statistics Canada in June of 2005 states that crime rates generally declined throughout
the 1990’s. In fact “from 1993 to 2000, the overall rate of violent crime dropped by 9%”. The major conclusion
reached by this study is that “periods of inflation appear to be associated with financially-motivated crime” and
“throughout the 90’s when inflation rates were relatively stable, crime rates declined.” Good financial times equals
less crime, according to this study. But what if one particular group of people in Canada were constantly under
financial duress? Could that have anything to do with the increased prevalence of crime among a certain
demographic?
Andrew Heisz, of the Business and Labour Market Analysis Division of Statistics Canada issued a report
in September of 2005 to expose some key insights into the trends and conditions that have been observed in
Canada’s major cities. This of course, was done using a variety of statistics on the nation’s cities, using census
data. He begins the report by announcing that growth in the Canadian population, by 55% (1.6 million people)
between 1981 and 2001 was largely due to immigration, and this “growth...caused the CMA’s boundary to expand,
[and has] formed challenges for the delivery services, and placed strain on the labour market.”
This report is divided into a ‘top ten list’ of insights, a majority of which deal with some form of
inequality or fundamental economic transformation within Canada’s CMA’s. One such transformation involves a
rise in the services economy, coupled with a complete decline in manufacturing in some areas, like Toronto and
Vancouver. This shift from manufacturing to services primarily benefits workers with more education.
Immigrants in the CMA’s
Most newly arrived immigrants choose their place of residence based on the fact that family and friends
will be living close by. In Vancouver, 64% of the entire population were first or second generation immigrants in
2001. In Toronto, indications are much the same, and projections suggest that this number is on the rise. It is
projected that in 2017, the percentage of immigrant population in Vancouver and Toronto will be 44% and 49%
respectively - that’s nearly half the total population.
Heisz concludes the section of the report focused on growth by saying, “Rapid population growth because
of immigration may place stress on the provisions of public services, such as education, and public transit.”
Statistics Canada has released an independent report covering this topic specifically (89-613-MIE-No.3).
The economics of immigration
“A substantial body of research has shown that the economic welfare of immigrants deteriorated over the
1980’s and 1990’s”. This is the opening line of the labour market analysis, which also points to a downward trend
towards poor outcomes for all new labour market entrants. The report states that “in Toronto and Vancouver, the
employment rate fell substantially only among recent immigrants...” in major cities between 1981 to 2001.
Many immigrants find work only on a part-time basis, or for part of the year. Even if they have a
university degree, immigrants are much more likely than their Canadian-born friends to be working in a job that
requires no formal education. In fact, 31% of recent immigrants with a university degree find themselves
employed in jobs requiring a low level of skill, and this is even more likely if they are female. Between 1995 and
1998, male immigrants earned on average 60% less than comparable Canadian-born workers in their first years
working in Canada.
All of these statistics point to a rather obvious and readily demonstrable increasing disparity among
Canadian families. During the 1990’s, incomes fell for most lower income families, and rose for most
higher-income families in a majority of Canadian cities. Low-income rates, as previously mentioned, are higher
among visible minorities and immigrants, Aboriginal people, and single parent families. Because of this, they are
disproportionately represented among the working poor. On average, the people in these groups have incomes less
than half that of the average Canadian. Conversely, the gap between rich and poor neighborhoods is also growing.
In Toronto, over the past 20 years, the average family income in the poorest neighborhoods rose only 0.2%, while
their richest neighbors enjoyed a 23% increase in annual income. Even though these poor neighborhoods exist,
according to 2001 data, over 33% of city dwellers are renting homes they can’t afford.
Perhaps the picture gets too bleak, perhaps the funding runs dry. Whatever the reason, the last few pages
of the report offer less researched effects in the CMA’s, such as disparities in the administration of health needs,
commuting and transportation obstacles, as well as environmental and infrastructure issues. The full report
entitled “Ten Things to Know About Canadian Metropolitan Areas...” can be viewed online at www.statcan.ca.
The Facts
It’s no secret that the crime stories of recent times have focused on Indo-Canadian gangs, and the black
street gangs in Toronto. When determining the opinion of Canadians on various crime prevention measures, the
Ipsos-Reid pollsters even made the suggestion of targeting certain ethnic groups for possible civil liberty
restrictions in the name of proactive crime prevention. Over 30% of those polled agreed with enactment of such
measures, if necessary. So it would be nothing new to say that we as a country see gangs, drugs, guns, and certain
ethnic groups as all being interrelated. It would be naive to suggest otherwise, given the ethnic and socioeconomic
composition of our institutionalized population. That being noted, why do these criminals do what they do? Can
anything be assessed from the general statistical position these various ethnic groups occupy within our country?
What do these data suggest?
When planning strategies to effectively deal with crime in our large metropolitan centers, the statistics on
these social infractions need to be consulted, and the recommendations made by paid government researchers need
to be heeded. Canada does not need another Jane Creba, caught in the crossfire of something it seems even her
government does not have the insight to understand. What Canada needs is an accurate understanding of the
context behind the crime, a complete picture of the average Canadian criminal.
From this statistical exploration, it can be understood that most criminals are young minority men, whose
cohort have a better chance of possessing a post-secondary education than the average Canadian. Even if they
don’t have an education, more visible minorities are pursuing an education than the rest of the Canadian
population. These young men and women, although highly capable, face barriers in securing employment. If and
when they are able to find a job, it is usually one which requires few of their educational skills and pays very little
in comparison. The employment available can be spotty, often part time or only for certain parts of the year. A
large portion of minority families live below the poverty level because of these challenges, and according to
government reports, it’s only going to get worse. With inflation and populations on the rise, and income levels
that have remained stagnant for the past twenty years, visible minorities in Canada are facing an even tougher
battle. Many find it difficult to support their families, their wives often earning less than they do. Difficulties in
obtaining adequate child care or supervision for older children is common. The expense of out-of-school-care and
extracurricular activities often cannot be met, leaving children to fend for themselves, sometimes adopting a gang
as a surrogate family. Many new immigrants and visible minorities attend post-secondary schools to improve their
chances of economic success, but graduate only with debt and a job that can’t pay the bills.
Punishment is only effective if potentially offensive behaviors are warded off by positive reinforcement,
when subjects behave in a prosocial manner. People need to reap their just rewards when they follow the socially
prescribed course of action. Judging by the economic situation of a large portion of visible minorities in Canada,
and given their high levels average of education, there is clearly a lack of any real positive reinforcement for the
majority of them who attempt to engage in prosocial behavior.
These facts should be cause for concern for all Canadians. The ramifications of a population explosion on
the delivery of essential services could prove to be brutal. British Columbians have already dealt with the
consequences of dissatisfied teachers, in part due to overcrowded classrooms, and we Canadians have heard a lot
about the current stresses on our health care system causing unimaginable waits for those in need of surgery. In
order for sustained and stable economic growth to continue here in Canada, there must be a corresponding growth
in our population. Without large numbers of immigrants entering into our country, economic growth would not be
possible; the rate of population growth would become insufficient to sustain the economy.
Are we as Canadians prepared to deal with the undeniable consequences of our fast-paced economic
growth in urban centers?
The Future
Potential leaders of tomorrow ought to be listening. Voters in Canada need to be educated when they
make their choice on election day. Suggestions of costly prison terms and more police may be a quick and easy
political manoeuvre under the bright of the media lights, and under the pressure to prevent more innocent deaths,
but all the options and their consequences must be evaluated. Could money used to incarcerate people be used
more effectively?
Government reports project that in 2017, nearly half the population in our major city centers will consist
of immigrants. Add to that the already existing Canadian citizens that happen to be visible minorities, and the face
of the population is in for a drastic change. The visible minority is becoming the visible majority. According to the
statistical projections, there will be more poor, educated, visible minority people than ever before in this country.
By that time, as the numbers suggest, they should be even more impoverished as a group than they are now, facing
ever-growing obstacles in obtaining perhaps even basic health care and education.
If crime control strategies continue in the direction they’ve been taking, the inevitable shift in population
constitution to a comparatively poor visible majority might prove to be more of a challenge than anyone might
have originally anticipated.. Best to ban those handguns now, or it might start to look like a revolution.

Can I get a capital B for Black?


Media Usage of Dated Ethnic Terms Archaic and Offensive
By Keetah Bryant (FRL)
In my personal experiences as a university educated, visible minority, single mother in Canada, I have
found the reflection of our society provided by the media to be highly inaccurate. There continues to be fast-paced
demographic changes in all of Canada’s major cities, yet the media it seems cannot keep pace with this change.
The views presented, the presenters, and the topics covered, both in daily papers and television programs are all
representative of a more nostaligic and ethnocentric era. Bad enough that this lag in development is still evident in
government, but in the media too? The modern population, it’s constituents, and the corresponding concerns are
all going unnoticed by the very institutions the Canadian public have come to trust as pillars of truth and
representation.
Where are the visible minorities? Where are the stories and analsyses that are directly related to their
position in society? Surely there is something more to say about this growing segment of our population, other
than the familiar and redundantly thoughtless stories on group specific criminality and gang involvement. These
consequential fallacies are what prompted me to apply my knowledge in social sciences to the world of journalism.
This road has been far more diffiult that I ever could have imagined. One of the first challenges to ethical
and representative journalistic practice is found in the standardized guidelines for journalists in Canada.
The Canadian Press (CP) began in 1917, the same year the University of British Columbia first opened
it’s doors. The role of the Canadian Press, has grown and changed since it’s inception to include a broadcast
division, Broadcast News(BN). According to Eric Morrison, president of CP/BN, The Canadian Press “provides
service to private television and radio broadcasters, as well as audio to Internet sites and wireless services”. With
this vast influence, apparently CP is able to “tell[s] people the story of their country every day, in all forms and
from all corners of the land”.
It’s a nice thought, but actions speak louder than words. In order to accurately tell people of Canada the
story of their country, you must include all of them in it - in the creation of it, in the telling of it, in the guidelines
covering it’s production. It appears CP has done nothing to ensure the participation of all Canadians in this very
crucial process, even though it purports to represent us all.
I myself am of mixed ethnicity; Ukrainian-African to be precise. But wait a minute, according to the CP,
there’s generally no need for “hyphenated descriptions of race”. I might also call myself Mulatto. But wait a
minute, according to the CP, the words “black, mulatto, red, yellow and white” do not name “race” and are
therefore lower case.
In the CP stylebook, the “bible consulted by journalists”, the section entitled “Race” mentions to “let
people speak for themselves”. The people have been speaking, and no one is listening.
The fact that the term “race” is still in use by an organization that apparently sets the standard for
journalism in one of the most ethnically diverse countries in the world is an embarassment. I believe we all belong
to the human race, we just happen to be of different ethnicities. The word “race” connotes some fundamental
difference in quality between one type of organism and another. CP, by it’s definition and use of the word “race”,
has contributed to an erosion in “black” identity. By determining that the words “black” and “mulatto” are not
terms of “race”, CP has served to diminish the importance of the ethnicity and culture of “black” people in Canada,
an ethnicity that continues to exist despite the definitions and lack of capitalization. These are the definitive
guidelines in Canadian jouranlism, taken straight out of the most recent edition of the Canadian Press Stylebook.
It’s ethnocentric and archaic.
I do not find it acceptable, that because I am the descendant of slaves, taken from Africa, that I should not
be entitled to an ethnicity. Why is the only identity available to me one that starts with a lower case letter? Why is
it that the Canadian Press has determined for all black Canadians that they have no ethnicity status, and the only
way they ought to be identified is by the color of their skin? If I cannot claim mixed race status, if I cannot call
myself mullato, Ukranian-African, but merely “black”, can I therefore choose to call myself Caucasian instead? I
am, after all, half white. Can I assert my whiteness? Can I respond to census questions on ethnicity by calling
myself Caucasian? Would that eliminate the adverse social conditions that I have to face because of my difference?
Would it be a useful distinction in understanding the unique and changing face of the Canadian population?
The words people choose, or are given to describe themselves, are more than mere physical descriptions.
Ethnic terms assist individuals and groups in forming unique positive identities within this multicultural nation.
In Canada, there are Asians, Aboriginals, Indo-Canadians, Quebecois, Caucasians, Europeans, and blacks. No one
would ever think it politcally correct to call an Asian person by their most physically differentiating feature.
Women might think sometimes about calling men by theirs, but that would be considered derogatory. What makes
it any more correct to identify an entire class of people strictly based on the color of their skin? This type of
discourse the norm in Canada, in the papers, on the television, and most sadly, among the “black” people of this
country. CP has determined this is the only acceptable way for “black” Canadians to define themselves, and I find
that inexcusable. How can we as a people form a positive identity around the mere color of our skin? The time for
using the word “black”, to identify people has ended. Change is always difficult but most often necessary, and in
order for people to evolve, their discourse and their language must do so first. This is Canada, the destination of
the Underground Railroad and international leader in multiethnic unity - can we do away with the slave talk,
please?
From this point forward, I should like to inform the Canadian Press, it’s affiliates and supporters, that I
personally find it offensive to be identified as merely “black”. For anyone of any skin tone to be defined merely by
such a superficial differentiation is offensive, and quite frankly, very ethnocentric. My skin is not black, it’s
brown. I have freckles and green eyes. I have Ukrainian family and family of African descent living in this
country. Both sides of my family have been living in this country for four generations. I am not merely ‘black”,
thank you.
We all know that the people you call ‘black” originated in Africa, just as Japanese people originate from
Asia. We are of African ancestry, we are not just “black”. I am a human being first and foremost, but it seems we
live in a time that differentiations have been deemed necessary. If I must differentiate myself from the rest of my
fellow human beings, the members of other nations, and the rest of unblack Canada, then I chose the term
Afro-Canadian, because I have an identity beyond the color of my skin, as does the rest of the Afro-Canadin
population.

The Rant of 2006 - The State of Our Union

The State of Our Union: The Rant of 2006

January has not been a very good month for me (nor was it any kinder to many of our other fellow citizens
around the world). It blew in fiercely with the shooting death of Jane Creba in Toronto, which then proceeded to
whip into a storm, amidst our federal elections and the accompanying declarations of mandatory sentences, hand
gun bans, and increased border security. It was at that point that I felt something was going really wrong with
2006, that somehow we’d gotten off to a very bad start. I’m sure Paul Martin and Ralph Goodale would agree, that early January was when it all started to go downhill.
I’m not an idiot or an ideological zealot of any kind. I mean, I attended post secondary school for a total
of seven years, full-time. I accumulated an incomprehensible student loan debt while I also struggled in the
shadows of illegal (and sometimes shameful) activity to support myself and my son as I went to school . I still
lived below the poverty level. I learned from first-hand life experience, and from the teachings of my school
professors that the current prison system is ineffective, and that stiff penalties for crime do nothing to deter it, and
may even exacerbate it. I’ve also been reading for the past six months on the practices of journalism. Blindly
patronizing the independence-killing Chapters, I purchased books on how to break into the writer’s world, here in Canada. Apparently, a novice freelance journalist begins with the local newspapers, submitting pieces that follow the guidelines of the Canadian Press Stylebook. (This irritatingly authoritative instructional manual is now in my collection of ethnocentric texts that require a 21st century overhaul to reflect the diversity and equality, however elusive, that apparently represent Canada).
So I began to write. I did my research with Statistics Canada, consulted the opinions of numerous experts,
and crafted a highly-logical and immediately relevant piece based on my knowledge and research, and related it
directly back to the current situation at hand in our country. Assured that it would assist voters in making a more
informed decision by revealing the hidden complexities between crime, ethnicity, poverty, and systemic biases, I
gladly sent the piece off to a number of publications both here and in Toronto. A week went by with no response. I was checking the papers daily, and then on Friday I saw that the argument was to be presented in the Vancouver Sun’s Westcoast Weekend edition, by some tenured columnist at the paper. The revised article revealed none of the unpalatable truths presented in my submission, but rather altered the argument to support an entirely counterproductive approach to crime. (This is a very long story, and for those of you who are interested in the contents of my submission, or the details of my heated e-mail conversations with Editor-in-Chief of the Vancouver Sun, Patricia Graham, please, e-mail, call, I’ll tell you all about it).
To make a long story short, I started to do a bit of investigation as to why the media here in BC is so
blatantly one-sided. I stumbled upon Canada’s conspiracy theory of the new millennium, with more than enough
evidence to back it up. This evidence (garnered from public, government, and private sources) concerns
high-ranking government officials, large corporations, and partisan participation in backroom government
operations. I even found actual speeches made by these “players” where they openly implicate themselves in the
manipulation of public opinion and government policy creation.
There was no where to send the information here in BC - the media lock-down was already in place.
(Once again, for the complete set of details, information, research, etc. involved in this grand conspiracy theory,
please call or e-mail me, and I’ll find a way to get it to you). During this time, I had also applied for a job at the
CBC, the only viable place I believed to be remaining, for ethical journalism to thrive. I sent them the information,
all of it, as a part of my resume. I sent the information, all of it, to a lawyer in Toronto who apparently works to
protect minority rights within society and the media. I sent the information to Gilles Duceppe. I photocopied it, I
bound it, and I sent it overnight delivery to all of these places. As of yet there has been no response from any party that has received this crucial and highly relevant information. All of them have the power to act, none of them chose to do so.
When Hamas won the elections in Palestine, I was shocked and hopeful for the people of Palestine - with
their choice came the hope of a future, free of occupation. At the same time, it dawned on me, that Hamas winning would be terrible news for the rest of the mass-socialized Western clan. But I had hope. I stayed tune. Maybe the leaders of the Western world would, as they should, accept what democracy has produced and work with it in the spirit of global diversity, choice, and cooperation. I should have known better than to hope.
It’s no wonder no one wants to run the Liberal party these days. Who needs a party affiliation, or even a
political one? Heck, people like Derek Burney, a key corporate member of BC’s media giant CanWest Global, and key member and lecturer in numerous energy and defense corporate boards, can just walk in, and advise our new leader of “transition” actions behind closed doors! Who needs government with power like that??? Even the previous front-runner of the Liberal leadership race, Frank McKenna, could tell you that. Rub elbows at a few major corporations for a number of years, have those corporations make contributions to the Liberal party and it’s election campaigns, and suddenly Paul Martin’s appointing you Ambassador the United States. Frank McKenna has plenty of friends in high corporate places, and judging by the looks of our government and it’s actions, that’s where all the power is anyway these days. And there are people who know this besides me, and no one chooses to do anything about it.
Last night’s “State of the Union” address by the American president had me drinking Malox like it was
our rapidly disappearing fresh water supply. And of course, there’s Canada’s Stephen Harper trying to play
“first-rate” here in Canada, racing to keep up with the proverbial US Jones’ by altering military chains of
command and wasting no time in establishing more Canadian military muscle, both at home and abroad. Oh yes,
let’s not forget his balking at the Kyoto accord either, which would ensure Ralph Klein and his fossil fuel rich
Alberta could keep burning and selling the quickly disappearing commodities (coal/oil) for centuries to come. We
are starting to look like Americans in training.
I sat tonight, in front of the TV as I most always do at 5 PM, and watched one of my favourite programs
on the CBC, with George Strombolopolous. I watch it more intently now, wondering if the program got my job
application, if they’ve even read the things I’ve sent them. There’s a lot of new ideas on the show, good
perspectives that seldom come out anywhere but on the CBC. After all, it was the CBC, not any other network,
who gave me the most unbiased insight into the Hamas/Palestine/Israel/Gaza Strip situation. They seem to be the
only ones left.
I sigh to myself as George interviews a television personality in front of a commercial newsstand. The
camera shifts from face to face, as they exchange thoughts on Hamas, Stephen Harper and Oprah. In the
background, there’s People magazine with Jennifer Anniston on it, there’s Oprah’s “O”, there’s a dozen other
repulsive pop-culture titles with shiny gloss covers of skinny girls with too much paint on their faces, and there’s
George and his guest empathizing with the plight of the Palestinian people, all the while not wanting to appear as
if they had taken any side. In between what seemed to be purposely featured magazine covers (Forgive me if I’m
wrong, but this is how it appeared, and if this is the case, it can only mean that the CBC is having to accept
corporate funding to run their programs, and as such it might be governed by a corporate mandate as well,
regardless of what is written or what is purported about our public media devices). were the blue glimpses of
Adbusters latest magazine, “The Biggest Ideas of 2006”. (Everyone in the world should read that magazine, and it should also be less expensive. Just my opinion.)
The program faded in and out of my conscious awareness, as I sat through a star-studded commercial for
Motorola, and then another ad for Cialis (which happens to be a drug which assists men with their
non-functioning, flaccid penises when they would rather have them otherwise). This is on our PUBLIC
TELEVISION NETWORK. If you’ve read Adbusters latest issue, or if you’re anyone with any sort of concern for the future of our society, the fact that these sorts of things are occurring on our ONLY public broadcasting stationis cause for outrage and grave concern.
In a world where we struggle to free ourselves from mental pollution, when we are struggling to gain
clarity and insight into situations and events, how can we possibly be effective if our sources of information are
polluted as well?
On the National, they are currently running a story on a well known, well respected doctor in Canada
who was awarded the Order of Canada, based on his extensive and influential research into health, nutrition and
immunology. The only problem is, that most of Dr. Chandra’s research is fraudulent. The university which
employed him to teach the next generation and to do research, will do nothing about it. The federal government
will do nothing about it. Nationally recognized, Dr. Chandra contributed to Canadian society by falsifying
research to allow nutrition and pharmaceutical companies (including his own) to exploit the purchasing public.
(This sort of story does nothing for the opinion of Indo-Canadians held by some Surrey residents. My friend
believes that most Indo-Canadians are corrupt and will do anything to beat the system, yet the individual knows
little of the poor economic situation faced by a large number immigrants and visible minorities in Canada today,
regardless of the their high levels of education. The individual perceives only the increase in numbers of
Indo-Canadians in their community, while also knowing little about government quotas that need to be reached in
order to sustain Canadian economic growth. This half-blind perspective is enhanced by the proliferation of the
gangster/villain image of Indo-Canadians constantly portrayed in our local papers and news media. This is where
a lack of valid and pertinent information is damaging to society, and the concept of censorship by omission should
not be disregarded by ethical journalists).
Here’s an idea: there are a plethora of post-secondary institutions here in Canada that require funding to
survive. There are a plethora of people in this country who are willing to do almost anything for a buck, especially if they don’t get caught (this is not limited to criminals, but includes doctors, lawyers, educators, journalists, pollsters, CEO’s, etc., really anyone who’s been born into this capitalistic society, that values wealth above all else). There are a plethora of pharmaceutical and food companies who are willing to pay big bucks for the right kind of information, especially the kind of information that will give them an edge over their competitor or allow them to begin selling their product without further regulatory hassles. The mentality exists in this country, and others, that profit is the primary concern. This means it is placed above the health, safety, and welfare of others. Profit is the only concern.
In between the news stories like the one on Dr. Chandra, the CBC runs those make-me-puke “Cialis”
commercials. It is up to the viewer to decipher the hidden meanings, the elusive truths, the lies, the theories, the
seemingly obligatory promotion of one thing or another. The CBC has lost it’s explanatory power, it’s value to the nation and the common people, by falling into the hands of corporate controls and mandates, and by not explaining to their viewers that they have been forced to do so, due to lack of government funding.
Sure, you can argue that it’s a necessary evil, something required to keep the non-partisan programming
flowing, but no evil is truly necessary. Do we as Canadian citizens who work 8-10 hours a day, who are burdened with debt and already mistrusting of our government, need to be responsible for solving the riddle presented in the mixed messages sent to us by the CBC? Is there not the individual or united power of those working at the CBC to inform the Canadian public of the adverse effects (on people, their minds, families, environment, etc.) of the global corporate mandate that seems to be turning us all into monothinking sheep? Can’t we all admit that we have been adversely affected by this and that something must be done to bring about lasting change?
It seems rather obvious and simple on the surface. Media, publications, politicians, speakers, whoever...
they are all either talking from the left or from the right, or maybe somewhere in the middle, but generally (unless
you’re the ever underrepresented NDP) either they are conservative or liberal in their views, yes? I say NO.
The idea of Conservatives, Liberals, two-party systems, I am going to assert, are all illusions. They may
have functioned some time earlier in history when resources weren’t as scarce and populations were less polarized by superficial and financial differences, but not anymore. They currently serve to provide our society with the illusion of having a choice, with the illusion that the values of one party or another actually stand for anything tangible. This illusion of free choice assists in the proliferation of the corporate mandate, which really couldn’t care less whether you take communion on Sundays or frequent your local swingers club with your underage sex partners, as long as you support the ideologies, institutions, and political leaders that will ultimately lead to corporate profit. The new divide is not between people and people, between right and left, between liberal or conservative, republican or democrat, environmentalist or oil main.. The divide is between profit and people.
From now on I propose a more honest party system, if it is to exist at all. If it’s corporate interests you’d
like to serve, take up a gold membership with the Profit Party. If it’s the interests of your fellow man you serve,
join the People Party. Suburban icons of political independence like Chuck Cadman could enter into the People
Party, with folks like Mother Theresa, Jack Layton (if he means what he says), Gilles Duceppe, and other socially
conscious folk. Then, for the others who have no concern for the future, future generations, environmental
impacts, ethics, or anything else that gets in the way of them and their corporate buddies earning exponential
incomes at all costs, we will have the Profit Party. (I personally would nominate Hemptown, and it’s CEO’s that
used to work for Nike and Adidas during the heyday of ignorance and silence about sweatshops, to lead the Profit Party. It’s a stellar example of a corporation that relies on it’s pseudo-social responsibility to prey on People’s desire to make the right choices, both globally and locally. It’s one of those corporations that’s leading the way with marketing in the 21st century, designed to make those who hate to buy, buy. Read all about them, their corporate policies, and all the fine print that makes them exempt from any sort of responsible behavior on their website. Just so as you know, I happen to own a few articles of Hemptown clothing - I do not pretend to be immune.)
Based on this new system of categorization, it would be far easier to solve world problems, find unity
within and without borders, and actually get on with the business of running the planet and sustaining societies.
The beauty of this new conceptualization is that is can even be applied retroactively to countries, people,
organizations, and their actions in the past.
Sifton? Obviously he belongs to the Profit Party because he built the railroad and industry in British
Columbia at the cost of immeasurable suffering and pain on the part of people. Trudeau? He belongs in the People Party, for his brash associations with other People Party supporters. This same logic can also be applied to the actions of individuals, groups, or countries. All you have to do is merely ascertain whether the action was
undertaken to help people, or to further a profit aim. Things can get a little tricky when you look into situations in
the Middle East, often because the Profit Party likes to disguise it’s actions as pro-People, in order to garner the
popular support of the larger, yet more destructible, and easily emotionally influenced People Party.
It seems as if the CBC has been usurped by the Profit Party, and is being turned against loyal People Party
members in an effort to confuse and control them. In order to maintain the strength of the People Party, I would
ask that those people who work at the CBC, find it within themselves to recognize their duty to the party of their
birth, the People Party. We ask that they do whatever is in their power to educate and liberate members of the
People Party that have been caught up in the same web that they now find themselves.
Although we of the People Party may be poor, tired, exasperated, confused, scared, reactionary, or
ignorant, we require those of you who are not, to help us find our strength. For those of us who have strayed into
the seduction of the Profit Party at the expense of our fellow citizens in the People Party, we ask you to reconsider. There is no room for People when Profit has had it’s way with our world. The People Party is deteriorating and fragmenting at a faster rate than ever before, spurred on by the pervasive and divisive forces of mass propaganda and increasing disparity.
The People Party is not based on exclusion, stratification, or discrimination. It includes men, women, and
children, of all ages, ethnicities, shapes, colors, and sizes. It includes sick and healthy, rich and poor, Muslim
Christian, Buddhist ,Jew, Animist, Tribalist - you name it. The People Party consists of Blacks, Caucasians,
Asians, Arabs, Africans, Latinos, and all human beings from all corners of the globe. Do not be fooled by cheap
imitations, that come in the form of exclusive and rigid institutions and ideologies, that work to seduce members
away from the People Party. Do not fall prey to any form extremism, exclusion, isolation, domination or slippery,
self-centered legitimization - these are the tools of the Profit Party and have no place among People. Be wary of
falling prey to the stereotypes, structures, and institutions that the Profit Party impose upon your life. Scour your
texts, your newspapers - monitor all your sensory inputs for evidence of the Profit Party and it’s permeating
ideological mandate, and guard against it.
The best defense against the destruction of the People Party and it’s accompanying habitat (our planet), is
awareness, openness, honesty, empathy and respect. With these five defenses in place, with these open unbiased
eyes that look both to the past and to the future, we of the People Party can guard against any further assaults on
our psyches, and hence our unity, and we will be in a position to grow in strength and numbers in the coming
years. There is no room for error, no excuse for failure in any action you take. Every choice matters, and it is up
to each and every one of us to make a difference, and begin to chose people over profits with every breath we take, every need we fulfill, every desire we have, and every luxury we indulge in.
Do not despair if mistakes are made, or have been made in the past. With each mistake comes a valuable
learning experience which always brings knowledge and understanding upon acknowledgment. The key is in the
acknowledgment.
What do we need to acknowledge? Have we as Canadians been far too long venerating the actions of our
forefathers in settling this land? Have we acknowledged and repaired our mistakes with this country’s true people, the numerous First Nations tribes across the continent? Have there been instances in the past where we as Christians have killed and conquered in the name of our God? Would Jesus have approved of that? Would it not be fair to assume that terror begets terror? That hate begets hate? Do not we as Christians, we as Muslims, we as Jews, all share the same fundamental belief that “thou shalt not kill?”
Questions like those can be difficult for everyone, especially when we are all responsible. But the
questions need to be asked so that the answers will begin to lead to workable solutions for all the world’s People. Denial, avoidance of consequences, and comfort above equality and reality, are all a part of the corporate ideology that runs so deeply through our nation. I can take solace in the fact that I am not the only female to feel insecure without makeup. We can take solace in the fact that it is no one individual, religion, political system, or nation, that is responsible for the current state in the world.
The most difficult thing to reckon with however, is that we each have an individual and personal
responsibility in correcting the mistakes of our forefathers. We urgently need to begin thinking, speaking, and
acting in a new, sustainable, and completely inclusive manner, that is free from stratification, domination, and
righteousness.